| Summary: | FILEOPEN: MSO ODT - Numbering list number reset on following page | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) <philipz85> |
| Component: | Writer | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOTOURBUG | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | jorendc, rb.henschel, xiscofauli |
| Priority: | medium | Keywords: | filter:odt |
| Version: | Inherited From OOo | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part1.html#attribute-text_continue-numbering | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 103369 | ||
| Attachments: |
sample file
Word 2013 VS LibO 4.3.1 how it looks in calligra |
||
Created attachment 104041 [details]
Word 2013 VS LibO 4.3.1
Created attachment 104042 [details]
how it looks in calligra
Word has it as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.
LibO has it as 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
Calligra has it as 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16.
Repro, Version: 4.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: c67026f27023008d124c8ab76533169f032b04f6 TinderBox: MacOSX-x86@49-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2014-08-17_08:03:30 Problem still present in Version: 5.0.0.5 Build ID: 1b1a90865e348b492231e1c451437d7a15bb262b Locale: es-ES (es_ES) on Windows 7 (64-bit) Migrating Whiteboard tags to Keywords: (filter:odt) ** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.1.6 or 5.2.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170103 reproducible with lo viewer version: 5.5.0.0.alpha0+ / build id : ec79f34 / android 5.1 repro 5.0.0.0.alpha1+ [ build id: ab465b9 ] 5.1.0.0.alpha1+ [ build id: 1a6ec13 ] 5.1.0.0.alpha1+ [ build id: 5b791ec ] 5.2.0.0.alpha0+ [ build id: f6a74ce ] 5.3.0.0.alpha1+ [ build id: 4136757 ] 5.4.0.0.alpha0+ [ build id: 3902bb7 ] os: android 5.1 device: lyf flame 3 [ ls-4001 ] TextMaker show it similar to Word - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. WebODF shows it like LO - 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Regina: thoughts? TextMaker show it similar to Word - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. WebODF shows it like LO - 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Regina: thoughts? ** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug I think, it is not an error in LibreOffice. But the way Word writes it to file does not reflect what Word shows. Word uses the attribute text:continue-numbering. But that attribute references the previous list (see URL). To continue a specific list, in this case the list before the indented list, the attribute text:continue-list (section above the linked one in the URL) has to be used. (In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) from comment #9) > Regina: thoughts? It is a bug in Word. The "previous list" belongs to a different list style, and therefore it is not continued. Otherwise the numbering would be 7 and not 5 as Word shows. |
Created attachment 104040 [details] sample file Steps: 1) open attached file 2) you'll see a numbering list on the first page from 1 to 4 3) scroll to second page and the numbering list resets back to 1 Tested on 4.3.1 on Linux and master on Windows.