| Summary: | Bibliography entries in same-paragraph footnotes are in wrong order, not ordered by document position | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | mini-matze |
| Component: | Writer | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | NEW --- | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | heiko.tietze, ilmari.lauhakangas, sasha.libreoffice, stephane.guillou |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | Inherited From OOo | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133266 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95285 |
||
| Whiteboard: | BSA | ||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 101258, 103164 | ||
| Attachments: |
Sort example - 1)If all in one pg 2)cut and paste one footnote in an other pg
The LO document of the example PDF export after update all using 4.5 alpha from Jan 25th 2015 |
||
Created attachment 58747 [details]
Sort example - 1)If all in one pg 2)cut and paste one footnote in an other pg
Created attachment 58748 [details]
The LO document of the example
Thanks for bugreport with second attachment reproduced in 3.3.4 and 3.5.4 on Fedora 64 bit Tools->Update->Update all not fixes order of entries In footnotes area order should be from [1] to [5] Changing version to 3.3.4 as most early reproduced ** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.3.5 or later): https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team Created attachment 112907 [details] PDF export after update all using 4.5 alpha from Jan 25th 2015 Is this the wrong result after update all? Win 7 Pro 64-bit Version: 4.5.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 784d069cc1d9f1d6e6a4e543a278376ab483d1eb TinderBox: Win-x86@62-TDF, Branch:MASTER, Time: 2015-01-25_23:07:36 Yes - this is the wrong result after update all! Please add an linebreak after each footnote, so every footnote has its own paragraph. Now update (F9) an the order of the Footnotes is: 1 Test4[1] 2 Test1[2] 3 Test2[3] 4 Test3[4] 5 Test5[5] Now delete the linebreaks, so you have the initial document an press already F9 - now you see: 1 Test4[1] 2 Test1[4] 3 Test2[3] 4 Test3[2] 5 Test5[5] Look only at the numbers in the brackets! They change!!! But the order of the footnotes was not changes. We have only add paragraphs between them! Hope you can comfire this. I testet with LO 4.4.4.3 an the bug is already there. ** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.4.1 or 5.3.6 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170901 Dear mini-matze, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug Still the case in: Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 4a0d671706306661c4a5072ce4769dc47bc65f71 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Was already the case in: OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 OOO330m20 (Build:9567) Instead of the original summary: > "FORMATTING: Wrong number of bibliography entry in footnote" I would describe the issue as: "Bibliography entries in same-paragraph footnotes are in wrong order, not ordered by document position" ...because the numbers refer to the right entries, but the order does not respect the "By document position" setting. Still present in 7.5.6 |
Problem description: If I insert more then one footnotes in the same paragraph and add a bibliography entry behind the text in the footnote, the number is not correct sort! (Important: LO only sorts wrong if the footnotes are in the same!! paragraph. If every is in a different the sort works correct - see attachment) Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a long paragraph 2. Insert several footnotes 3. Add bibliography entries behind the text in the footnotes 4. Insert an Bibliography 5. Check "Number entries" and sort by document position 6. Press F9 (Tools->Update->Update All) Current behavior: You see something like: 1 Footnote one [2] 2 Footnote two [1] 3 Footnote three [3] 4 Footnote four [5] 5 Footnote five [4] ... Expected behavior: Sort of the bibliography entries must be correct Platform (if different from the browser): Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0