Summary: | Impress displays images differently on different machines (screen resolutions?) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Eric M <majzoube> |
Component: | Impress | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | ||
Severity: | major | CC: | ilmari.lauhakangas, robert_averbeck |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.4.5.1 release | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102296 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 104238, 116082 | ||
Attachments: |
before forcing redraw of the slides in slide sorter
after forcing redraw of the slides |
Description
Eric M
2018-02-17 16:03:19 UTC
The following steps *might* mitigate the problem, but are certainly not ideal. 1. For an existing image in a presentation, right click on an image and select "Compress". Then **deselect** "Reduce image resolution". Then select "OK". 2. Crop as needed. Then do all of (1) again. 3. When importing new images, follow the steps in (1), crop as needed, and again do (1). Finally, even if one follows the steps above and the images display correctly on the slide view, they are still typically mucked up on the 'slide sorter' view. The slide thumbnails are redrawn at some point in working with a presentation and then look fine, but the redrawn thumbnails are lost on closing the .odp. The resolution to these two problems seems like it might be relatively quick for a developer who knows the code. A. Why not, when importing new images just go through the compression steps listed above? Whatever that does internally in the .odp appears to work in most cases. B. To solve the 'slide sorter' view problem, why not just redraw all the thumbnails whenever a presentation is opened? One last comment is that if an .odp presentation with mangled *slide sorter* images is saved in .ppt format, and opened again with LibreOffice, the slide sorter view of the .ppt slides is fine, the thumbnails are sharp and the images are not mangled. For this to work the slides have to be OK in the normal slide view, fixed by the methods in my comment 1. Here is a macro that forces LO to redraw the slide thumbnails. This is poorly written, and simply loops through the slides and will copy, paste, and delete each one. I don't what call I need to just force a redraw of the thumbnail, but this works. For some reason this only works if you are in the 'slide sorter' view. REM ***** BASIC ***** REM * You must be in 'slide sorter' view for this to work!! REM Sub refresh msg = "Starting refresh..." oDoc = ThisComponent oSlideList = oDoc.getDrawPages() REM loop through all slides and copy, paste, delete each one For i = 0 to oDoc.getDrawPages().Count-1 oSlide = oSlideList.getByIndex(i) REM msg = msg & "get slide : " & i oController = oDoc.CurrentController REM oCurrentPage = oController.CurrentPage oDispatch = createUnoService( "com.sun.star.frame.DispatchHelper") oProvider = oController.Frame oDispatch.executeDispatch(oProvider, ".uno:Copy","", 0, Array()) oDispatch.executeDispatch(oProvider, ".uno:Paste", "", 0, Array()) oDispatch.executeDispatch(oProvider, ".uno:Delete","", 0, Array()) Next i REM msgbox msg End Sub Could you attach a screenshot of the mangled state? You said "I have posted bug reports before on this" - could you provide links to these reports? There is currently ongoing work regarding the handling of bitmaps. You might want to test a daily build. https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@70-TDF/current/ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel/Linux Created attachment 140451 [details]
before forcing redraw of the slides in slide sorter
I have attached two png files. first.png shows the slides in slide sorter as opened from a .odp file. After I run the macro above to force it to redraw the slides, it becomes the after.png.
Created attachment 140452 [details]
after forcing redraw of the slides
My previous bug reports 108879 and 111340 were related to this bug, but those are largely solved by following the steps I outline here. *** Bug 116164 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** NEW per dupe Dear Eric M, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug Dear Eric M, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug Dear Eric M, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug |