Summary: | Cannot set caption order for individual object types in AutoCaption | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | sdc.blanco |
Component: | Writer | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | dgp-mail, heiko.tietze |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.2.7.2 release | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153248 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33338 |
||
Whiteboard: | |||
Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 108957 |
Description
sdc.blanco
2023-02-07 15:05:35 UTC
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0) Basic assumption from my POV: Consistency within a document. > Basic problem #1: Cannot select "Caption Order" separately for different > objects. I confirm the described behaviour, but to have a consistant layout, it's the expected behaviour. To make it more clear I would make caption order only selectable, if you click on that dialog (should be greyed out in all other cases) > Basic problem #2: The "Caption Order" setting is always changed by the > value selected in Insert Caption - Options - Caption Order. I confirm the described behaviour. To support a consistant layout it's the expected behaviour, but this behaviour isn't clear for the user. We should at least add a tooltip and add information to help page [1] But I see a different problem #3 A change in caption order settings doesn't affect existing captions LO should at least give an option for that. In sum: Topic for design-team (In reply to Dieter from comment #1) > I confirm the described behaviour, but to have a consistant layout, it's the > expected behaviour. Plausible use case for wanting different caption orders for different objects For image or user-defined: First Illustration Second Illustration Third Illustration For table: Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 > A change in caption order settings doesn't affect existing captions LO same point raised in bug 153248, comment 4 Yes, this is missing. Relevant for bug 153248 about UI redesign. |