| Summary: | Spelling - Contractions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | keepitsimplestupid |
| Component: | Linguistic | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
| Status: | UNCONFIRMED --- | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | michael.warner.ut+libreoffice, sophi |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
| Attachments: | Mis-punctuated contraction was actually caught | ||
|
Description
keepitsimplestupid
2021-07-09 23:16:25 UTC
Created attachment 173484 [details]
Mis-punctuated contraction was actually caught
I'm not sure what you mean. If you look at the attachment, you can see that the nt in "would;nt" *was* caught, and the user can see from the surrounding text the "would;". Document contains: Isn;t recieve Fir recieve I'm offered replacements of receive and others. For Isn;t I am not. The highlighted portion is "Isn" I think that "isn;t" should be highlighted and I should be offered the replacement of "Isn't" So, you have to move the cursor; delete the ";", type a "'" rather than one click of "change" or "correct" I do it too often. |