Summary: | Editing cross reference field does not pre-select current mode | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski> |
Component: | Writer | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | dgp-mail, raal, xiscofauli |
Priority: | medium | Keywords: | bibisectRequest, regression |
Version: | 6.4.2.1 rc | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 107905 | ||
Attachments: | A sample cross reference field |
Description
Mike Kaganski
2020-03-13 08:03:12 UTC
I confirm it with Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: c63148ba139bd6b9ae7a0f9e24e51f29e5370963 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win; Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI-Language: en-GB Calc: threaded cannot confirm with Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: a11c10a83f6fceae6cfb519725d06f8eaf1013fb CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; I can't reproduce it in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 4ee7ee1c4a515479bc174543af4dbc400035c0ba CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: x11; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded Is it possible, that it is only Windows? I can't reproduce it in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: 59b755eb93136ea28916e875ee28a50ac7c12fb5 CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win; Locale: en-GB (en_GB); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded Not reproducible in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: ec85ed21a960a198a01778cdb89a91fabcb5d0c0 CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win; Locale: en-GB (en_GB); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded either Not reproducible in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: bc898e2c2784e36ad4d4cdf6d962e39069d2c82d CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win; Locale: en-GB (en_GB); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded Yes, WORKSFORME. Thanks! But is it fixed in upcomung 6.4.3? (it is still broken in 6.4.2.2) |