Bug 115189

Summary:	Implement Traditional Mongolian sorting
Product:	LibreOffice	Reporter:	Volga <shanshandehongxing>
Component:	LibreOffice	Assignee:	Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs>
Status:	NEW ---
Severity:	enhancement	CC:	hiunnhue108, marklh9, suokunlong
Priority:	medium
Version:	Inherited From OOo
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:	needsUXEval
Crash report or crash signature:		Regression By:
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	108386, 115607
Attachments:	Translation GB/T 30851-2014

Description Volga 2018-01-24 07:28:02 UTC

Description:
Chinese national standard GB/T 30851-2014 defined sorting order for Traditional Mongolian script, so we are reasonable to get implement for this, it would be useful for document written in Mongolian.

This standard is already available on the internet, click 在线预览 button to preview it online if you can read Chinese.
http://www.gb688.cn/bzgk/gb/newGbInfo?hcno=6C324F10BE522B261FEE456001A887A1

Steps to Reproduce:
-

Actual Results:  
-

Expected Results:
-


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:


User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Android 5.1.1; Mobile; rv:58.0) Gecko/58.0 Firefox/58.0

Comment 1 Kevin Suo 2018-02-10 04:10:21 UTC

Hi Volga, as this standard is in Chinese, could you please try to download this standard, and make a general translation of it?

You can do the translation by openning the pdf file with LibreOffice Draw. When Finished, attach the translated pdf file in this bug report, or provide a link.

I set this bug is NEEdDNFO for now. Please set it to NEW and add Keyword "needsUXEval" when provided the above info, as I agree this is a valid feature request.

Comment 2 Volga 2018-02-10 10:13:20 UTC

Created attachment 139754 [details]
Translation

OK, this is my translation, based on a scanned PDF download from http://www.bzfxw.com/soft/sort055/sort053/294204.html

Comment 3 Volga 2018-02-10 10:15:39 UTC

Created attachment 139755 [details]
GB/T 30851-2014

Original PDF from the same source.

Comment 4 Kevin Suo 2018-02-10 11:37:55 UTC

This is a feature request, rather than a real bug, so the importance should be ENHANCEMENT.