Summary: | Tiling bitmaps does not work for charts (Format Wall) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | peekaa <peekaa> |
Component: | Chart | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | ilmari.lauhakangas, kris.kr296, peekaa, suokunlong, xiscofauli |
Priority: | medium | Keywords: | bibisected, bisected, regression |
Version: | 5.4.0.0.alpha1+ | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 113224 | ||
Attachments: |
dialog adding bitmap
result - tile not fullfilled the background |
Description
peekaa
2017-11-29 10:32:01 UTC
Created attachment 138056 [details]
dialog adding bitmap
Created attachment 138057 [details]
result - tile not fullfilled the background
Repro, but not with 4.4 I guess this is because of the new Area dialog, so no need to bibisect. Version: 6.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: cc1db6f2b0ebe05ae807628778835b62df00eca2 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: default; TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-12-03_00:59:10 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); Calc: group threaded I have the same problem. Tiling is not active, image is not fit to wall of the graph. LO 5.4.3.2 ID: 92a7159f7e4af62137622921e809f8546db437e5 still not fixed in 6.0 :-( Bug already exits in the "oldest" version in the 6.0 bibisect repo, on linux. Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 9feb7f7039a3b59974cbf266922177e961a52dd1 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.14; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: zh-CN (zh_CN.UTF-8); Calc: group Regression introduced by: author Rishabh Kumar <kris.kr296@gmail.com> 2016-08-22 16:48:05 +0530 committer Katarina Behrens <Katarina.Behrens@cib.de> 2016-10-12 08:36:13 +0000 commit 686349476e03f951f4a9ff9755b9f71951b64ea5 (patch) tree 7cb559cca9cf88dc0a2e2a957244701ab0b4fe60 parent da01e9ec5dfb7787b4a3669486b3940590933850 (diff) [GSoC] Move all fill style tabs inside area tab Bisected with: bibisect-linux-64-5.3 Adding Cc: to Rishabh Kumar *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 104658 *** |