Summary: | [UI] [NotebookBar] [Groupedbar] Functions that invoke the sidebar must be toggleable in Impress | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | Bastián Díaz <diazbastian> |
Component: | Impress | Assignee: | Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | kainz.a, libreoffice-ux-advise |
Priority: | medium | Keywords: | needsUXEval |
Version: | 6.0.0.0.alpha1+ | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Crash report or crash signature: | Regression By: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 107158 |
Description
Bastián Díaz
2017-11-23 07:30:22 UTC
Sounds reasonable. But taking the Slide Transition as example it also means to make .uno:SlideChangeWindow a toggle function, to show a checkmark in the main menu, and to close the sidebar when this feature is unchecked. That's likely unwanted in non-Notebookbar modes. So the request is either a) a WONTFIX or b) we accept possible drawbacks for different visualizations. I tend to a) because of simplicity. Thanks for the bug report to give the possibility to talk about this topic. As there are a lot of different NB implementations and at the same implementation there are different behavior I would close this bug with wantfix. Example: Ordinary NB give the users the possibility to use the sidebar. In Impress you NEED the sidebar for transition and some other stuff. Also draw functions would be a good example, cause first the sidebars are an big improvement for transition and draw functions have transition stuff in a horizontal toolbar is not that intuitive than in the sidebar. So from the designer point of view (groupedbar and tabbedbar NB) I tend to use the NB as much as possible, BUT if the sidebar layout is more useful, I would use the existing sidebar instead of reimplement (and maintain) a NB. |