Bug 107707 (Writer-Tables-Enhancements)

Summary:	[META] Writer table enhancements requests
Product:	LibreOffice	Reporter:	Telesto <telesto>
Component:	Writer	Assignee:	Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs>
Status:	NEW ---
Severity:	normal	CC:	aron.budea, thomas.lendo
Priority:	medium
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Crash report or crash signature:		Regression By:
Bug Depends on:	33631, 34397, 38543, 40350, 40879, 43524, 49258, 52596, 57189, 57792, 61934, 63634, 63725, 66019, 69305, 70384, 71261, 75375, 77336, 81808, 85754, 88600, 89112, 93395, 93811, 96576, 99035, 101123, 102359, 113603, 113604, 114467, 114633, 126610, 130807, 135734, 136931, 143138, 143848, 145738, 149556, 152232, 34388, 35302, 35570, 37223, 48763, 51689, 64242, 72040, 82504, 83623, 87590, 88807, 90165, 90602, 90882, 90883, 95741, 99027, 102193, 103141, 104172, 105597, 109155, 112704, 115098, 116685, 117232, 121705, 121857, 122648, 123116, 127759, 129039, 131629, 136239, 136316, 150136, 151828, 155618
Bug Blocks:	103100, 120581

Description Telesto 2017-05-08 18:34:22 UTC Comment hidden (no-value)

Description:
 

Actual Results:  
 

Expected Results:
 


Reproducible: Always

User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:


User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0

Comment 1 Roman Kuznetsov 2019-01-20 19:19:54 UTC

Telesto, why need this META if we have bug 103100 Writer tables and (also) enhancements?

Comment 2 Telesto 2019-01-20 21:31:30 UTC

(In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from comment #1)
> Telesto, why need this META if we have bug 103100 Writer tables and (also)
> enhancements?

Main reason: meta bug 103100 quite bloated if they are all listed at once. So differentiating between 'enhancements' and 'real' bug more for convenience. It also gives a nice listing of the enhancement request. But that's my take on it... Not sure what the common opinion is about the need for this meta bug.. I probably didn't ask for permission either.. So feel free to close it, if it improves things in one way or another.

Comment 3 Roman Kuznetsov 2019-01-21 10:25:47 UTC

(In reply to Telesto from comment #2)
> (In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from comment #1)
> > Telesto, why need this META if we have bug 103100 Writer tables and (also)
> > enhancements?
> 
> Main reason: meta bug 103100 quite bloated if they are all listed at once.
> So differentiating between 'enhancements' and 'real' bug more for
> convenience. It also gives a nice listing of the enhancement request. But
> that's my take on it... Not sure what the common opinion is about the need
> for this meta bug.. I probably didn't ask for permission either.. So feel
> free to close it, if it improves things in one way or another.

I agree with you, so I offer:

1. Rename bug 103100 to general [META] Writer table bugs
2. Move all enhancements from bug 103100 to this bug 107707

Comment 4 Thomas Lendo 2019-01-30 19:18:21 UTC

Please do not hustle. This enhancement meta bug is only for bugs that don't fit into another sub meta bug, regardless if it's a bug or an enhancement request. So please don't move enhancement requests from other sub meta bugs to this meta bug.