Bug 92572

Summary:	Enable minimal ReferenceMarks support in Impress
Product:	LibreOffice	Reporter:	digisus <lists>
Component:	Impress	Assignee:	Not Assigned <libreoffice-bugs>
Status:	NEW ---
Severity:	enhancement	CC:	cno, heiko.tietze, xiscofauli
Priority:	medium	Keywords:	needsDevAdvice
Version:	Inherited From OOo
Hardware:	Other
OS:	All
See Also:	https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73275
Whiteboard:
Crash report or crash signature:		Regression By:
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	101258
Attachments:	Zotero inserting a reference (see zotero buttons top right)

Description digisus 2015-07-06 14:44:09 UTC

Created attachment 117080 [details]
Zotero inserting a reference (see zotero buttons top right)

Hello!

It would be great if Impress would understand ReferenceMarks like Writer does. This was, one could manage references (e.g. citing course for graphics) and show a list of references at the end.

I am not suggesting to fully implement the only very limited Bibliography database again for Impress. I'd rather suggest to implement enough under-the-hood logic, so that e.g. zotero -- a tool that already integrates quite well with Writer -- would be useable in Impress, too.

See screenshots from Writer+Zotero and the tweet conversation I had with a guy from zotero about it.
-> https://twitter.com/adam42smith/status/617029198847283200

What are your estimates for a minimal implementation of this functionality?

Thank for considering!
digisus

Comment 1 Cor Nouws 2016-12-17 08:03:43 UTC

Hi digisus,

Thanks, a clear idea and I support the suggestion.

(In reply to digisus from comment #0)

> What are your estimates for a minimal implementation of this functionality?

You mean in development time or ...? If you would like to know, I think you may make some contact via the professional support page here
  http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/professional-support/

ciao - Cor

(NB: the page referred from your twitter description seems unavailable)

Comment 2 Heiko Tietze 2017-01-17 16:19:50 UTC Comment hidden (no-value)

Definitely worth to do, likewise bug 73275. Adding it to the bibliography pile; unless we have a mockup the UX keyword should be kept.

Comment 3 Heiko Tietze 2018-12-21 09:55:58 UTC Comment hidden (no-value)

(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> Definitely worth to do, likewise bug 73275. Adding it to the bibliography
> pile; unless we have a mockup the UX keyword should be kept.

Nonsense, the UX of Zotero is not of our concerns. What we have to evaluate is the ability of additional fields in Impress (see bug 53548).